Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 31 through 41 (of 41 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Additional scanning aids #1175

    I can print in black by buying black ABS but the provided cup bottom is white and sides are more golden.

     

    Its NOT pretty, but I am putting a small amount of sample in it about 5mm thick, I like big blueberries 😉

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    in reply to: Model Error #1173

    Yes, using the web software Sciolab, I created 6 models.  The first two went fine.  The third would display some of the information on the right column, but the graph does not display.  At this point it appears the page is finished loading but clinking on any more buttons cause the rainbow wheel spin of death.

     

    in reply to: The Numbers #1167
    in reply to: Additional scanning aids #1164

    Oh, I forgot to mention my scanning distance is 20mm if that changes anything…

    in reply to: Additional scanning aids #1163

    My quick design for a open bottom gadget works pretty well.  The scans I am getting are very consistent as long as I don’t move the device.  It holds the scanning distance to a constant and I know I won’t smear the sensor with a slight bump.

     

    I printed this gadget with white ABS plastic.  The provided cup is really interesting to look at, there is a reflective surface on the sides and white? on the bottom.  This surface looks very golden to me but polished copper could look very similar.  What is it?

     

    There is a paint that will dry to very close the reflectiveness of either gold or silver.  My other option would be to use aluminum foil to coat the inside.

     

    Any advice?

     

    in reply to: The Numbers #1153

    Look at the top of the page.  Under developers Resources…

    in reply to: Additional scanning aids #1152

    Ok, so I can’t attach the .STL

    in reply to: Additional scanning aids #1151

    I made a quick .STL file with an open bottom to keep my scanning distance exactly the same for a set of scans.  I plan on making a few more at different distances so I can scan the same sample at multiple distances.

     

    The file should be able to be printed by any 3D printer.

    in reply to: The Numbers #1136

    Thank you, I now see where in the online documentation my question was answered…  Its OK to say RTFM..

    in reply to: Mushroom Identification #1080

    Mushrooms are an interesting specimen and has a few cororlations with another project of mine.

     

    Many kinds of shrooms can be bought at the local market, but its the hallucination  and posison ones that are in short supply as specimens to test.  One model could be to exclude anything that isn’t a verified “safe” mushroom but identifying a morell .vs. a protabella, both safe to eat, could solve the same issue  without the need of the dangerous ones…

    in reply to: The Numbers #1052

    The wave length makes sense for the x axis, but the y axis changes too much when normalizing.  Without normalization 0 – .325 but after normalization its between -1.5 and + 1.5.

Viewing 11 posts - 31 through 41 (of 41 total)