I have been using the SCiO for a while now and making new discoveries daily. It appears that scanning distance affects the spectrum. This makes sense to me. The suggested distance of a blueberry away from the material can produce a light that is large for small samples. After CP advice and experiments I found that scanning on a black eyeglass cloth works well. I want a way to make this distance consistent…
In a prior thread I wrote that I had created a “holder” for my samples by virtue of a 3d printer using ABS plastic. This had the result of “seeing” more of the plastic than my sample. A discussion of water salt solutions resulted in my knowledge that an individual compound reacts with water so much as to effect the spectral graph. In order to create a model, samples would need to be created and scanned at many different concentrations. You can’t scan pure h2o and pure salt and use math to find the concentration in a mixture. I get it with this example of water…
Thats the background.
My question now is what if the mixture is with compounds that do not interact. Does the same issue exist in a mixture of sugar and salt?
Could my 3d printed gizmo work if I could scan the ABS plastic and “subtract” the ABS spectrum?